| SECTION 1.0 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with several refinements and improvements to the proposed Trans Bay Cable Project (Project). The City of Pittsburg, California is the lead agency for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Final EIR was issued on October 16, 2006. The Final EIR was certified by the Pittsburg City Council on November 6, 2006. The Pittsburg City Council approved a Development Agreement pertaining to the portion of the Project in Pittsburg, and the Pittsburg Power Company Board of Directors approved two agreements related to the ultimate ownership and operation of the Project. The Pittsburg City Council also adopted the CEQA Findings and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and approved an Amendment to the zoning overlay for a group of parcels on West Tenth Street in Pittsburg; the Amendment to the zoning overlay is necessary to allow the proposed Project facility in Pittsburg on the aforementioned parcels.
As discussed in the Draft and Final EIRs for the Project, the proposed Project is a 400 megawatt (MW) high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission line consisting of installation of an approximately 53-mile-long HVDC cable system in San Francisco Bay and adjoining waterways, from a terminus in the City of Pittsburg in Contra Costa County to a terminus in the City of San Francisco in the vicinity of Potrero Point (refer to Figure 1-1). The Project is proposed to transmit electrical power from a converter station in Pittsburg to a converter station in San Francisco, providing a dedicated connection between the East Bay and San Francisco. This electrical power delivered to San Francisco would help meet the City of San Francisco's electrical demand projected for 2012 and beyond. The Project is designed to be a cost-effective, energy-efficient solution addressing San Francisco's need for additional transmission capacity, while improving transmission reliability and load-serving capability. The HVDC transmission line would provide San Francisco with a highly reliable, secure source of the electricity needed to service the load in San Francisco.
In summary, this EIR Addendum evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the following Project refinements and/or improvements:
The adoption of the HVDC PLUS technology into the Project design allows the proposed converter stations in San Francisco and Pittsburg to be smaller in size (site area and height substantially reduced – refer to Section 2.0 of this EIR Addendum for details).
Subsequent to preparation and certification of the Final EIR, it was determined by the Applicant (Trans Bay Cable LLC) that necessary land/property purchase agreements were unlikely to be successfully negotiated with the landowner for the western portion of the West Tenth Street Alternative 1 converter station site in Pittsburg. With the adoption of the HVDC PLUS converter station technology/design for the proposed Project, the proposed converter station in Pittsburg is now located on the eastern portion of the West Tenth Street Alternative 1 site as evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs, and extending approximately 50 feet toward the south of that site.
The proposed Project refinements evaluated in this Addendum would reduce potential Project-related impacts (e.g., visual, noise, construction traffic, earthwork requirements, etc.) as presented in the Final EIR, and the proposed Project would not result in any unavoidable significant impacts.
The City of Pittsburg as CEQA Lead Agency has determined that an Addendum to the previously certified EIR is required pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines in order to address the proposed Project refinements and improvements. The analysis in this EIR Addendum describes the proposed Project refinements (refer to Section 2.0) and focuses on those aspects of the Project refinements and modifications that have the potential to result in a significant impact. As applicable, the impact assessments presented in Section 3.0 of this Addendum identify any changes to the impact findings and/or mitigation measure requirements relative to findings in the certified Final EIR. In each case, the impact findings are unchanged, and in several cases, the previously-identified impacts are reduced in scope.
1.2 SUMMARY OF PROJECT REFINEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS
1.2.1 Overview
The general location of the proposed Project, including the converter stations in San Francisco and Pittsburg and the submarine HVDC cable route, is shown on Figure 1-1.
Two primary refinements to the proposed Project design are evaluated in this EIR Addendum relative to the description of the proposed Project presented in the Final EIR as issued on October 10, 2006 and certified by the Pittsburg City Council on November 6, 2006. These refinements are:
While Siemens has utilized HVDC Plus in a number of applications over the past several years, the technology has only recently become commercially available for possible inclusion in a project like Trans Bay Cable. After certification of the Final EIR, Trans Bay Cable LLC and Siemens representatives met extensively in Germany. At the conclusion of those meetings and extensive technical review, the Applicant determined that the HVDC PLUS converter station technology was commercially available and appropriate for the Project. Due to the now-current commercial availability and substantial environmental and economic advantages as compared with HVDC conventional design technology, the Applicant has determined that the Siemens HVDC PLUS design should be incorporated into the Project.
Siemens "HVDC PLUS" technology essentially involves the use of modular semiconductor and capacitor units to convert electricity between AC and DC, instead of the previous thyristor-based system. The adoption of this technology has the following advantages compared to the HVDC design evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs for the proposed Project:
1.2.2 San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) Site
As discussed in Section 1.1 of this EIR Addendum, the proposed converter station in San Francisco is located at the HWC (Mitigated) site as evaluated in the Draft (Section 4.0) and Final (Section 4.A) EIRs. The HVDC PLUS technology/converter station design allows the converter station at the San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) site to have a smaller footprint than the conventional design evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs. The HWC (Mitigated) HVDC PLUS converter station site evaluated in this EIR Addendum is a subset of the San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) Converter Station site evaluated in the Final EIR. The HVDC PLUS technology/converter station design and layout also allows the converter station at the San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) site to have less equipment, be substantially lower in height, have a smaller footprint (thereby allowing for a 90-foot-wide buffer between the converter station fence line and the east side of Illinois Street), and to produce less noise (refer to Section 3.11 for more information).
1.2.3 Pittsburg West Tenth Street Site
The smaller HVDC PLUS converter station footprint allows the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 converter station evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs to be shifted onto the eastern portion of the previously evaluated converter station site. The western portion of the previously evaluated Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 site is no longer needed for the proposed Project, with the exception of a temporary construction access road. This change also allows the approximate 255-foot buffer between the screening/security wall located along the southern converter station boundary line and the north side of West Tenth Street to be potentially landscaped following construction to help visually screen the facility. Final determinations regarding the future land use of this buffer area have not been made at this time. Any landscaping of the buffer area would be subject to City of Pittsburg design review approval. The converter station operational access road would be constructed along the western boundary of the buffer area. This buffer area was previously the southern part of the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 2 site.
1.2.4 Submarine Cable
Prysmian's refinement of the submarine HVDC cable design involves the use of two, 200 kV cables and a fiber optic cable bundled system versus the previously evaluated one 400 kV cable, one 12 kV return/ground cable, and a fiber optic cable bundled system. The overall diameter (approximately 10 inches) of the refined submarine cable bundle, the installation method (i.e., cable lay vessels and hydroplow), and operational characteristics are the same as that evaluated for the previous design in the Draft and Final EIRs. No unavoidable adverse significant environmental impacts have been identified for the refined cable design (or the cable design evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs) related to construction or operation.
1.3 SUMMARY OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FINDINGS
The impact findings for the refined proposed Project utilizing the HVDC PLUS technology/converter station and submarine cable designs, including a listing of identified potentially significant impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impact findings are as presented by resource topic in Table 1-1 of the Final EIR. Table 1-1 of the Final EIR is presented in this EIR Addendum with an additional column to document the changes to the impact significance findings and/or mitigation measures between the HVDC PLUS Project evaluated in this EIR Addendum relative to the proposed Project (HVDC conventional design) evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs. The table presents the summary findings for the proposed Project in the following order: 1) San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) Converter Station site (as modified); 2) Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 Converter Station site (as modified); and 3) Offshore Cable Route. Refer to Section 3.0 of this EIR Addendum for more information regarding the impact findings for the proposed Project utilizing the HVDC PLUS design.
While many impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Project are considered to be potentially significant, with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures no impacts would remain significant. The refinements and improvements that have been made to the proposed Project (i.e., utilization of the HVDC PLUS design) further reduce the impacts of the Project as presented in the Final EIR and present no new potentially significant impacts.
The resource topics addressed in this EIR Addendum and a summary of residual impact findings for the proposed Project follow.
Issue/Resource Topic |
Resulting Level of
Significance |
Air Quality |
Less than Significant |
Geologic Resources and Soils |
Less than Significant |
Water Resources and Quality |
Less than Significant |
Terrestrial Biological Resources |
Less than Significant |
Marine Biological Resources |
Less than Significant |
Cultural Resources |
Less than Significant |
Land Use and Recreation |
Less than Significant |
Marine Transportation and Commercial Fishing |
Less than Significant |
Traffic and Transportation |
Less than Significant |
Noise and Vibration |
Less than Significant |
Public Services and Utilities |
Less than Significant |
Visual Resources/Aesthetics |
Less than Significant |
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management |
Less than Significant |
Paleontological Resources |
Less than Significant |
1 Assessments of the relative differences in impacts (by resource topic) between the HVDC PLUS design and sites evaluated in this EIR Addendum and that HVDC conventional design and sites evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs are presented in Table 1-1 and Section 3.0 of this Addendum.
TABLE 1-11,2
SUMMARY OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Potentially Significant Impact |
Mitigation Measure(s) |
Resulting Level of Significance |
Change in Impact Finding and/or Mitigation Measures for HVDC PLUS (Addendum) Versus HVDC Conventional (Final EIR)3 |
San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) Converter Station Site |
|||
AIR-1: Fugitive Dust Emissions. The Project proposes to use fugitive dust suppression with water and other methods to control construction-related emissions. The use of chemical additives is not planned. Controlled worst-case fugitive dust is estimated to be 29 pounds per day; 0.32 tons per month; and 2.6 tons over the 27- to 30-month construction period for the San Francisco site. Without fugitive dust control measures the impact is considered potentially significant. |
AIR-1: Fugitive Dust Controls. Best achievable control measures (BACM) shall be utilized during construction phases of the Project. Fugitive dust control measures are stipulated by BAAQMD Regulation 6 (BAAQMD, 1999) and shall include all of the following as applicable to the Project site:
|
Less than significant |
None; fugitive dust emissions would be reduced for the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller converter station footprint and reduced earthwork requirements. |
AIR-2: Equipment Exhaust Emissions. See Table 4.2-10 of the Draft EIR for emissions estimates for the San Francisco Converter Station site. The impact of these emissions would be considered to be potentially significant. |
AIR-2: Exhaust Controls. The following controls pertaining to equipment emissions (BAAQMD, 1999) shall be implemented during construction to reduce emissions from construction equipment exhaust:
|
Less than significant |
None; equipment exhaust emissions would be reduced for the HVDC PLUS converter station design due to the reduced construction requirements. |
GEO-1: Soil Erosion and Compaction. Construction activities would lead to soil compaction and could lead to soil erosion. This impact is considered to be potentially significant. |
GEO-1: Design Project for Erosion Control. Standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be incorporated into the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) for construction and operation, and shall minimize onsite soil erosion and offsite sedimentation. Temporary erosion control measures shall be required during the construction period to help maintain water quality, protect property from erosion damage, and prevent accelerated soil erosion or dust generation. |
Less than significant |
None |
GEO-2: Asbestos-containing Serpentine. The San Francisco site is potentially underlain with asbestos-containing soils and rocks. Asbestos could be released during construction phases at the San Francisco sites. Asbestos is a human health hazard when airborne. This is considered a potentially significant impact. |
GEO-2: Controls for Excavation of Serpentine. Prior to Project construction, previously-prepared geotechnical reports and boring and trenching logs from the site would be reviewed to identify areas of serpentinite bedrock that would be disturbed during excavation and Project construction. An Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan would be submitted to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) for approval in accordance with the Final Regulation Order Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be equal to or less than the HVDC Conventional design due to the reduced excavation requirements. |
GEO-3: Strong Ground Shaking. There is a high risk of strong ground shaking in the event of a large earthquake in the area. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
GEO-3: Design to Seismic Design Requirements. Due to the site's proximity to earthquake faults and the characteristics of the soil profile, a site-specific study shall be conducted to develop seismic design criteria. Project facilities shall be designed and constructed at a minimum to the seismic design requirements for ground shaking specified in the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4. Additionally, to satisfy the provisions of the 2001 California Building Code, these facilities shall be designed to withstand ground motions equating to approximately a 500-year return period (10 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years). For design purposes, site-specific ground motions shall be calculated for all project sites. |
Less than significant |
None; the HVDC PLUS design is less susceptible to damage from seismic shaking due to the simpler, more compact design. |
GEO-4: Liquefaction. There is a potential for liquefaction at the Project site. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
GEO-4: Design Project for Liquefiable Deposits. A site-specific program of exploratory borings and accompanying laboratory testing shall be required in order to delineate potentially liquefiable materials beneath the construction area. Geotechnical investigations shall be required for consideration prior to foundation design and development of site-specific design criteria. |
Less than significant |
None; the potential for liquefaction to damage converter station facilities under the HVDC PLUS design is reduced due to the smaller, lighter transformers. |
GEO-5: Shrink-Swell/Subsidence. The proposed San Francisco HWC (Mitigated) Converter Station site is potentially underlain with expansive soils, which requires specific attention during grading to avoid future heaving and cracking of overlying materials. The potential for damage due to shrink-swell/subsidence to site facilities is potentially significant. |
GEO-5: Design Project for Shrink-Swell/Subsistence. A program of site-specific exploratory borings and accompanying laboratory testing shall be required to delineate any potentially expansive materials underneath the proposed Project facility sites and to evaluate the potential for site subsidence and identify and implement appropriate design measures (e.g. pile supports or replacement of undesirable materials) in accordance with applicable codes. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-1: Erosion and Contaminated Runoff. Erosion and contaminated runoff during construction and operation could significantly impact water quality within San Francisco Bay. This is considered a potentially significant impact. |
WATER-1: Erosion Control and Contaminant Source Control. Apply for and comply with NPDES construction permit, and Industrial Activities General Permit. Requirements for the permits include submittal of a Notice of Intent, development of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), monitoring and inspections, and submittal of annual compliance reports. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-2: Surface Water Quality Impacts from HDD. HDD could have significant water quality impacts through loss of drilling fluids and disruption of Bay bottom sediment at the sediment surface where the borehole emerges. This is considered a potentially significant impact. |
WATER-2: Spill Prevention and Control Plan for HDD. Drilling shall be performed in accordance with a site-specific Spill Prevention and Control (SPCC) Plan for HDD Operations for Drill Fluids and Cuttings. Spill response measures included in this plan, should a spill occur, shall include reducing fluid pressures, thickening the fluid mixture, and/or adding pre-approved loss circulation materials (LCMs) to the mixture. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-3: Groundwater Quality Impacts from HDD. HDD could have significant water quality impacts through loss of drilling fluids that would increase suspended material in groundwater. This would be considered a potentially significant impact. |
WATER-3: Use of Pilot Hole and Reaming. HDD shall be performed using a pilot hole plus reaming technique to minimize the potential for impacts to groundwater. To prevent significant water quality impacts, drilling muds shall consist of naturally occurring materials such as water and bentonite clay, plus inert, non-toxic polymers. Both the drilling technique and early detection and response shall be used to minimize release of fluids to the environment. HDD shall start with completion of a small-diameter pilot hole. The pilot hole is gradually enlarged using reaming. This technique acts to prevent sudden loss of large volumes of drilling fluids. Early detection and rapid response shall be implemented to minimize loss of drilling fluids. In the event loss of drilling fluids is detected, natural LCMs such as cotton dust, cottonseed hulls, wood fiber, mica, and cedar fiber shall be added to the drilling fluid. Alternative actions that shall be considered and implemented, as required, include reduction in drilling pressure, thickening of the fluid mixture, and construction of spill control structures, pits, and silt fences onshore, or silt curtains offshore. |
Less than significant |
None |
CUL-1: Disturbance of Archaeological Resources. Buried historical resources may exist on the site and Mirant Potrero Power Plant site. Construction of the AC cable route from the converter station across the power plant property to the PG&E Potrero substation may disturb these resources. This is considered a potentially significant impact. |
CUL-1a: Archeological Resource Testing. Due to the potential for buried cultural resources within the Mirant Potrero Power Plant portion of the Project area, it is recommended that subsurface survey (i.e., testing) of the cable route across the plant utilizing mechanical exploratory borings be initiated prior to construction activities. The subsurface survey should be implemented as a means to determine the presence and extent of buried archaeological resources within the plant area as well as to evaluate the potential significance of any resources encountered. Identified remains would be evaluated against the NRHP/CRHR significance criteria. If the resources are not eligible for the NRHP/CRHR, then no further consideration of these resources would be required. If the resources are eligible for the NRHP/CRHR, additional mitigation measures may be required. The testing program would be documented within a technical report. The report would include the aforementioned resource evaluations, if any, and provide recommendations for the further management of cultural resources. Such recommendations could include data recovery excavations as well as the monitoring of all ground-disturbing activities associated with the project. CUL-1b: Archaeological Resource Data Recovery. Based upon the results of the testing program, it may be necessary that a data recovery excavation be implemented. CEQA stipulates that if avoidance of the important archaeological resource is not feasible, a data recovery excavation may be warranted. When data recovery through excavation is the only feasible mitigation, a data recovery plan, which makes provisions for adequately recovering the scientifically consequential information from and about the resource, shall be prepared and adopted prior to any excavation being undertaken. The development of this plan, as well as the implementation of field work, would be conducted in consultation with the SHPO, and, if the site is of aboriginal association, with the NAHC and local Native American community as well. CUL-1c: Archaeological Resource Construction Monitoring. Following completion of the archaeological testing efforts, it may be determined that construction monitoring is necessary to prevent significant impacts to important cultural resources. In the event monitoring is warranted, a qualified professional archaeologist shall be retained to observe all ground-disturbing activities associated with the Project. If archaeological materials are observed by the monitoring archaeologist, he/she would have the authority to halt all ground-disturbing activities within the vicinity of the exposed materials until the nature and significance of the find could be evaluated and mitigation measures implemented, if needed. The development of mitigation measures would be conducted in consultation with SHPO and, if the site is of aboriginal association, with the NAHC and local Native American community as well. |
Less than significant |
None |
TRAFFIC-1: Cumulative Traffic Impacts. Project-related trips to and from the San Francisco Converter Station site would contribute to delays on the regional roadway system, a potentially significant impact. |
TRAFFIC-1: Coordination to Reduce Cumulative Traffic Impacts. Truck shipments on the regional roadway shall be scheduled for non-peak periods when delays are less prevalent, as practical. The construction contractor shall coordinate with Caltrans to identify appropriate routings and times for site deliveries and comply with Caltrans recommendations. This mitigation measure would successfully mitigate the Project's contribution to cumulative impacts occurring on the regional roadway system. |
Less than significant |
None; the Project's incremental contribution to cumulative traffic impacts would be reduced by an estimated 20-25 % under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller facility, which would require less equipment and material deliveries. |
TRAFFIC-2: Oversized Loads. Oversized shipments would require a permit from Caltrans that identifies the permitted hours of operation and the size of the truck to transport the shipment on the regional roadway network. If the permit conditions were not followed adequately, this would constitute a potentially significant adverse impact. |
TRAFFIC-2: Coordination of Oversized Loads. Coordination with Caltrans and local jurisdictions shall be conducted to ensure proper permitting for oversized loads, which shall be required in advance of construction. |
Less than significant |
None; oversized load impacts would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller transformers (60 tons versus 80 tons of oil). |
TRAFFIC-3: Temporary Street Closures Affecting Traffic, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Circulation. The temporary closure of streets for Project-related construction would affect traffic circulation in the study area and may impede the delivery and access to businesses in the area and the use of the Bay Trail and bicycle circulation for short intervals. This impact is considered to be potentially significant. |
TRAFFIC-3: Signage for Temporary Street Closures. Any needed temporary closure of local streets in San Francisco will be mitigated by coordinating street closures with the San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) and, if appropriate, erecting signage that reroutes traffic onto neighboring streets. The coordination would account for providing continued access for emergency vehicles in the study area and ensure that the City of San Francisco's Emergency Operations Plan could be activated without impediment. With these mitigation measures, temporary construction impacts on traffic circulation would be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. |
Less than significant |
None |
TRAFFIC-4: Impacts on Metro East Light Rail Facility. If truck shipments were destined for the proposed laydown area (Western Pacific site) at the same time MUNI begins using 25th Street to dispatch light rail vehicles to Third Street, they could conflict with the most active light rail dispatch and return hours at the beginning and end of the peak periods. This is considered to be a potentially significant impact. |
Mitigation Measure TRAFFIC-4: Reducing Impact on the Movement of MUNI Light Rail Vehicles into and out of the Metro East Maintenance Facility. The Project laydown area located at Pier 94/96 is the preferred laydown area. As indicated in Section 4.10.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR, Construction-related Impacts, truck deliveries to the Pier 94/96 laydown area would not produce significant impacts along Cargo Way and would avoid a potential conflict with the movement of MUNI light rail vehicles along 25th Street. If the Western Pacific site were used as an alternative laydown area, the Construction contractor will coordinate with MUNI, Port of San Francisco, and the Department of Parking and Traffic to minimize delays to MUNI Metro operation and to define times for scheduling of truck deliveries if the truck deliveries were to occur during the peak period. |
Less than significant |
None |
PS-1: Construction Fire Hazards. Without appropriate precautions, construction activities requiring the use of flammable and combustible materials could create fire hazards. The potential to increase fire events could affect the level of service by the fire department to the surrounding area. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
PS-1: Construction Fire Prevention. A Construction Fire Prevention and Protection Program shall be developed for the Project to be followed throughout all phases of construction. The program will specifically address:
|
Less than significant |
None |
PS-2: Existing Onshore Underground Utilities. Without appropriate precautions, installation of proposed underground utility lines could impact existing underground utilities and public service connections. This impact would be considered potentially significant. |
PS-2: Utility Survey. Prior to any excavation work a survey shall be conducted to identify locations of subsurface utilities. |
Less than significant |
None |
PS-3: Operations Fire Hazards. Without appropriate precautions, operations requiring the use of flammable and combustible materials could induce fire hazards. The potential to increase fire events could affect the level of service by the fire department to the surrounding area. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
PS-3: Operations Fire Prevention. An Operations Fire Prevention and Protection Program shall be developed for the Project to be followed throughout all phases of operation. The program will specifically address:
|
Less than significant |
None |
VIS-1A: Converter Station Domination of View. Since the architectural design character of the building and the general character of proposed landscaping have not been identified in detail, there is the possibility of generating potentially significant visual impacts based upon the potential of the Project to dominate the scene or become obtrusive on views from Warm Water Cove Park. While this impact has been classified as less than significant without design controls, it may still be adverse. This adversity can be lessened through the application of Mitigation Measures VIS-1Aa and VIS-1Ab. |
VIS-1Aa: Plan Submittal Requirements for Building Materials and Colors. All major Project features, including buildings, structures, fencing, and sign backgrounds (excluding electric switch gear and related wires and cables, etc. which shall be galvanized gray as shown in the simulations) shall be painted with neutral tan or gray colors that will minimize the size and height of the facility, blend with adjacent structures and be compatible with natural landscapes where applicable. A specific painting plan shall be developed for approval by the agency with local jurisdiction to ensure that the proposed colors do not unduly contrast with the surrounding landscape colors. All treatments shall be in non-reflective colors. The painting plan shall be submitted sufficiently early to ensure that any pre-colored buildings, structures and linear facilities shall have colors approved and included in bid specifications for such buildings or structures. VIS-1Ab: Plan Submittal Requirements for Landscaping. A specific landscaping plan shall be prepared showing the location of proposed landscaping, the varieties and sizes of plants to be planted, and the proposed time of maturity for each species. Plants shall be selected from the approved species list prepared by the agencies with jurisdiction. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be substantially reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to smaller footprint (3 to 4 acres versus 5 to 6 acres for HVDC Conventional design), shorter buildings (35 feet versus 65 feet), shorter lightning arrestors (65 feet versus 80 feet) and reduced number, and the addition of the 90-foot-wide landscaped buffer east of Illinois Street. |
VIS-2: Converter Station will Create Substantial Light and Glare. There is potential for the Project to cast more ambient light into the immediate area than the existing conditions. There is also the possibility that the luminaries of some of the lighting fixtures may be seen directly by either residents of Potrero Hill or users of Warm Water Cove Park, which through the abrupt contrast of the fixtures' light with the surrounding general darkness, may create the effect of glare. While this impact has been classified as less than significant, without design controls it may still be adverse. This adversity can be lessened through the application of Mitigation Measure VIS-2. |
VIS-2: Plan Submittal Requirements for Lighting. Except as required by security and worker-safety requirements, night lighting shall be hooded to direct illumination downward and inward toward the areas to be illuminated in order to minimize nighttime light and glare, backscatter to the nighttime sky, and visibility of lighting to public viewing areas. A specific lighting plan consistent with operational and safety needs and limiting the general lighting levels to a maximum reasonable level shall be submitted to each agency with jurisdiction for approval. The plan shall include provisions for timed and/or motion detection-controlled switches. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced with the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller footprint and smaller buildings requiring less lighting. |
HAZ-1: Removal of Potentially Hazardous Building Materials Resulting from Demolition. Structures on the converter station site contain or potentially contain ACMs and LBP. Improper removal or remediation of these materials could result in a potentially significant environmental impact |
HAZ-1: Complete an ACM Abatement Plan and an LBP Abatement Plan. Complete ACM and LBP investigation and characterization on the converter station site to fill data gaps and to support development of worker safety procedures, in accordance with regulatory requirements to protect construction workers and the public. The ACM and LBP Abatement Plans shall be completed in compliance with application regulations based on the historical and newly acquired ACM and LBP data. If ACM and LBP are confirmed to be present in concentrations above regulatory limits, the Project proponent shall use ACM- and LBP-certified removal contractors and trained asbestos and lead-based paint removal workers, conduct dust monitoring, and properly dispose of generated wastes offsite. The Project proponent shall also prepare a site Health and Safety Plan for this work. |
Less than significant |
None |
HAZ-2: Soil Removal. Soils removed during construction of the converter station and cable routes could be contaminated. Improper sampling, handling, analyzing, or characterizing of the soils could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. Soils at the site are likely to be contaminated with metals and either TPH or PAHs, depending on location. Portions of a naturally occurring subsurface serpentinite ridge may require excavation. Serpentinite contains naturally occurring asbestos and these soils, if disposed of offsite, would likely require disposal as California hazardous waste. |
HAZ-2: Soil Removal Protocols. Previously uncharacterized soils that are stained or odiferous shall be segregated on plastic, sampled, and characterized for onsite use or offsite disposal. The Soil and Groundwater Management plans (SMP, GMP) shall detail storage, transportation, and disposal options for soil and groundwater excavated/extracted during the converter station construction. They would also specify dust monitoring needs for soil excavation and management. Previously characterized hazardous soils shall be loaded onto trucks for offsite disposal. Hazardous soil disposal requires that hazardous waste manifests accompany the waste. Hazardous waste transporters shall be required to haul hazardous soils to a Class I hazardous waste landfill. The personnel handling the hazardous soils are required to have met the OSHA hazardous work operations training requirements. A Health and Safety Plan shall be prepared for this work. Previously characterized non-hazardous soils shall be stockpiled for onsite or offsite reuse or offsite disposal, as needed. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would potentially be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller footprint and subsurface excavation requirements. |
HAZ-3: Construction-phase Hazardous Materials Use. Hazardous materials would be used during construction activities. Misuse, inadequate storage, or improper disposal of these materials could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-3: Reduction of Hazards During Construction Phase. The hazards presented by the use of hazardous materials during the construction phase are well understood, and the appropriate management controls to mitigate potential impacts shall be implemented. These controls include: 1) developing required management plans, e.g., a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (see HAZ-5 for more SPCC Plan details); 2) secondary containment; 3) separate storage of incompatible materials; and 4) proper training of personnel. Additionally, construction personnel shall be trained in safety and defensive emergency response procedures. Construction personnel shall also receive hazardous-waste-related training that focuses on recognition of potentially contaminated soil and/or groundwater that may be encountered during subsurface excavations for foundations or pipeline/cable trenches. If such contaminated soil or groundwater is suspected, contingency procedures shall be followed to protect worker safety and public health. All vehicles and construction equipment shall be inspected to ensure that no fluids are leaking (e.g., oil, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, or brake fluid) and that all fuels and fluids are stored in proper, clearly labeled containers. Hazardous materials that must be disposed of will be disposed of as hazardous waste in accordance with the appropriate regulations for storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller facility requiring less hazardous materials (e.g., fuel) to construct. |
HAZ-4: Construction-phase Waste Streams. Improper storage and disposal of solid waste and hazardous construction wastes could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-4: Management of Construction-phase Waste Streams. The onsite management and offsite disposal procedures of solid wastes (including potentially contaminated soil) shall be in a Solid Waste Management Plan for the Project. Waste shall be stockpiled temporarily before disposal offsite. The local fire department and emergency management team shall be provided a list of the waste material expected to be generated and stored onsite. Hazardous wastes generated during construction shall be collected in hazardous waste accumulation containers near the point of generation and moved daily to the construction contractor's 90-day hazardous waste storage area at the converter station site. The accumulated waste shall be delivered to an authorized waste management facility. The exact volume of hazardous wastes to be generated at the San Francisco Converter Station site cannot be estimated at this time, but the estimated amount of excavated soil that would need to be disposed of offsite is estimated at approximately 15,000 cubic yards for this converter station site. Even if this entire amount of excavated soil would need to be disposed of as hazardous waste, it would not exceed a significant portion of the available hazardous waste landfill capacity in California. The capacity details of various landfills for both non-hazardous and hazardous waste are detailed in Table 4.14-5 of the Draft EIR. The capacity and estimates for daily volumes of waste received were verified, as detailed in the personal communications provided in the references for this section. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller facility, smaller footprint, and reduced excavation requirements. |
HAZ-5: Construction-phase Accidental Spills. An accidental spill or a release of hazardous materials could occur during construction. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-5: Construction-phase Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures. The following shall be implemented both to prevent spills from occurring and to minimize impacts in the event that they do occur:
|
Less than significant |
None; the potential for this impact to occur would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller construction requirements and commensurate reduction in hazardous material usage. |
HAZ-6: Construction-phase Dust and Volatilization of Contaminants. Excavation of contaminated soil and generation of hazardous waste soils could result in construction dust and volatilization of contaminants that pose environmental and human health risks, particularly to construction workers. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-6: Reduction of Construction Dust and Volatilization of Contaminants. Dust control measures (i.e., keeping the soil wet during excavation) shall be implemented during excavation and construction activities, and dust monitoring shall be performed. Suspected contaminated soil that is stockpiled on the site shall be covered daily with plastic to prevent volatilization of contaminants and to control dust. Contaminated soil may also be loaded directly onto trucks for transport to an appropriate offsite disposal facility. The loaded soils shall be properly covered and manifested as necessary. Dust monitoring shall be performed during excavation and loading of hazardous soils. The accumulated waste will then be delivered to an authorized waste management facility. Dust monitoring shall confirm that the dust control measures are effectively protecting site workers and the public. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would potentially be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to reduced earthwork and excavation requirements. |
HAZ-7: Contaminated Groundwater. The San Francisco Converter Station site is known to have contaminated groundwater. Groundwater may be encountered during construction and groundwater dewatering. The lead regulatory agency associated with the proposed Project may require control or remediation of the site groundwater for redevelopment of the property. Failure to control the contaminated groundwater flow could result in a potentially significant impact. |
HAZ-7: Contaminated Groundwater Control. If groundwater was encountered during construction at the converter station site, the water shall be collected onsite in a tank or tanks, sampled, and analyzed. Based on the analytical data, the water shall be characterized for disposal by one of the following methods:
If groundwater was encountered at the HWC (Mitigated) Converter Station site and it was found to be contaminated, it is possible that the RWQCB would require groundwater control as part of the development plan for the Project on that site. Potential groundwater-remedial strategies would depend on a number of factors including: site contaminants, evaluation of impacts to human health and the environment, and evaluation of the technical merits of available remedial strategies. The final selection would be made by the RWQCB. Potential groundwater control methodologies include installing a slurry wall around a portion or the entire contaminated site combined with groundwater pump and treatment and discharge of treated groundwater to a storm drain/sewer system under the authority of an NPDES permit. Other alternative technologies include in situ biological treatment and in situ oxidation or reduction, depending on the site-specific contaminants and hydrogeological conditions. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would potentially be reduced due to shallower excavation depth requirements associated with the HVDC PLUS design. |
HAZ-8: Operations-phase Hazardous Materials Usage. Hazardous materials shall be used during operations and maintenance activities. Misuse, inadequate storage, or improper disposal of these materials could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-8: Control of Operations-phase Hazardous Materials. A Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) shall be developed and implemented prior to turnover of site management from the construction contractor to the operating company. All hazardous materials shall be handled and stored in accordance with applicable codes and regulations. Storage quantities of all hazardous materials shall be minimized, and non-hazardous materials shall be substituted for hazardous materials at the converter station to the extent practicable. Small-quantity chemicals used for maintenance tasks shall be kept in appropriate inflammable material or corrosive material storage lockers. Bulk chemicals shall be stored in ASTs, and all other chemicals shall be stored in their original shipping containers. Incompatible materials shall be stored in separate storage containment areas. Chemical storage areas and transfer areas shall be equipped with secondary containment sufficient in size to contain the volume of the largest container or tank, including an allowance for rainwater. Areas susceptible to potential leaks and/or spills shall be paved and bermed or otherwise secondarily contained. Specifically, the transformers and the diesel ASTs would have secondary containment. Periodic inspections shall be conducted to ensure that all containers are secure and properly marked. Piping and tanks will be protected from potential traffic hazards by concrete or other barriers. Hazardous materials will be delivered to the converter station periodically. Transportation of these materials shall comply with all applicable regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the EPA, DTSC, the California Highway Patrol, and the State Fire Marshal. An HMBP shall be prepared prior to delivery of specified hazardous materials to the converter station in conformance with Title 19 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and California Health and Safety Code Section 25504. The HMBP requires facilities to develop the following information:
|
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced due to the smaller facility and reduced maintenance requirements associated with the HVDC PLUS design. |
HAZ-9: Operations-phase Waste Streams. Improper storage and disposal of operational wastes could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-9: Manage Waste Generation, Storage, and Disposal During Operations Phase. Before facility start-up, an application shall be made to DTSC for a hazardous waste generator number. The facility shall not treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in a manner that will cause the facility to be characterized as a treatment, storage and disposal facility (TSDF). A detailed waste management plan shall be prepared prior to start-up to ensure proper storage, labeling, packaging, record keeping, manifesting, minimization, and disposal of all hazardous materials and wastes. The waste management plan will include:
Scrap materials such as paper, packing materials, glass, metal, and plastic shall be segregated and managed for recycling. Non-recyclable inert wastes shall be stored in covered trash bins in accordance with local ordinances and picked up by an authorized local trash hauler on a regular basis for transport and disposal in suitable landfill. Skimmed oil collected from equipment drains and other liquids from equipment shall be transported by an authorized carrier to a certified recycling facility. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced due to the smaller facility under the HVDC PLUS design generating less operational waste. |
HAZ-10: Operations-phase Accidental Spills. Non-compliance with regulatory requirements associated with storage, use, and containment of hazardous materials and/or petroleum hydrocarbons could result in accidental spills. The impact from accidental spills of these materials is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-10: Operations-phase Spill Prevention, Controls, and Countermeasures. The following shall be implemented during operations:
|
Less than significant |
None; the potential for this impact to occur would be reduced due to elimination of the need for an emergency generator and its associated diesel fuel under the HVDC PLUS design versus the HVDC Conventional design. |
HAZ-11: Operations-phase Fire and Explosion Risk. Non-compliance with regulatory requirements associated with storage, use, and containment of flammable materials could result in a fire or explosion. The impact of a fire or explosion is considered potentially significant. If the onsite fire protection equipment could not address the fire, outside agencies would need to be called. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-11: Reduction of Fire and Explosion Risk and Emergency Support During Operations Phase. The flashpoints of transformer oil and diesel fuel are 295°F and 100°F, respectively, and the auto ignition points are 484°F and 494°F, respectively (Sax, 1992; MSDS for transformer oil; MSDS for diesel fuel). The National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) assigns lubricating oils a fire hazard rating of 1, meaning that the materials "must be preheated before ignition can occur. Materials of these types require considerable preheating, under all ambient temperature conditions, before ignition and combustion can occur" (Siemens, 2006). The converter station shall have onsite fire protection systems (including emergency backup systems). During the detailed design phase of the proposed Project, potential fire protection designs and systems shall be reviewed with local agencies to finalize design details. In general, the fire protection system shall consist of automatic detection and firefighting equipment. The fire detection control panel will be located in the control room and will be connected to the control and protection system for remote annunciation. The fire alarm will be initiated automatically by smoke, heat, or flame detectors, or manually by push-button. A combination of detectors will be used, including infrared and ultraviolet detectors, ionization and optical smoke detectors, and rate-of-rise temperature-sensitive detectors, depending on the equipment and/or space being monitored. Audible alarms and flashing lights will be activated in the event of a fire. The equipment or area where the alarm is triggered will be indicated on the control panel. The firefighting equipment would initiate automatically, using water sprays and curtains or an appropriate gas-extinguishing agent. Fire detection and automatic firefighting equipment will be connected to a power supply within the fire-detection control panel, which will be connected to the mains via a power supply/battery charger unit with an internal 24-volt battery. A pump house shall be included within the facility with 2 diesel fire-water pumps, each 225 kW. |
Less than significant |
None; this potential impact would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller transformer oil requirements and the elimination of the emergency generator/diesel fuel storage. |
HAZ-12: Impacts from Seismic Activity. Failure to abide by the building code for Seismic Zone 4 could lead to damage to the facility and resulting spills of hazardous materials. This impact could be potentially significant. |
HAZ-12: Manage Seismic Activity. To minimize seismic damage to the facility and the resulting hazardous materials spills, the designers and construction contractor shall follow the 2001 California Building Code for Seismic Zone 4. This action would reduce Impact HAZ-12 to a less-than-significant level. |
Less than significant |
None; the HVDC PLUS technology with its smaller, less complex design is considered to be less susceptible to damage from a seismic event/ strong ground shaking. |
PALEO-1: Disturbance of Fossil Resources. There are no known significant fossil resources at this location. However, excavations associated with construction have the potential to penetrate into undisturbed Qal sediments, which could contain significant fossil resources. This impact would be considered potentially significant. |
PALEO-1: Potential Fossil Resources Protection. The following measures shall be implemented:
|
Less than significant |
None; this potential impact would be reduced due to the smaller HVDC PLUS footprint and reduced earthwork/excavation requirements. |
Potentially Significant Impact |
Mitigation Measure(s) |
Resulting Level of Significance |
Change in Impact Finding and/or Mitigation Measures for HVDC PLUS (Addendum) Versus HVDC Conventional (Final EIR)3 |
Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (As Modified) Converter Station Site |
|||
AIR-1: Fugitive Dust Emissions. The fugitive dust emissions impact (Impact AIR-1) described in Section 4.2.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. The Project proposes to use fugitive dust suppression with water and other methods to control construction-related emissions. The use of chemical additives is not planned. Controlled worst-case fugitive dust is estimated to be 39 pounds per day; 0.43 tons per month; and 3.4 tons over the 27- to 30-month construction period for the Pittsburg site. Without fugitive dust control measures the impact is considered to be potentially significant. |
AIR-1: Fugitive Dust Controls. Mitigation Measure AIR-1 described in Section 4.2.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None; fugitive dust emissions would be reduced for the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller converter station footprint and reduced earthwork requirements. |
AIR-2: Equipment Exhaust Emissions. The equipment exhaust emissions impact (Impact AIR-2) described in Section 4.2.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. See Table 4.2-13 for emissions estimates for this site. Without mitigation measures this impact is considered to be potentially significant. |
AIR-2: Exhaust Controls. Mitigation Measure AIR-2 described in Section 4.2.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None; equipment exhaust emissions would be reduced for the HVDC PLUS converter station design due to the reduced construction requirements. |
GEO-1: Soil Erosion and Compaction. The soil erosion and compaction impact (Impact GEO-1) described in Section 4.3.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
GEO-1: Design Project for Erosion Control. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 described in Section 4.3.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None |
GEO-3: Strong Ground Shaking. The strong ground shaking impact (Impact GEO-2) described in Section 4.3.3.2.2 of the Draft EIR applies at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
GEO-3: Design to Seismic Design Requirements. Mitigation Measure GEO-3 described in Section 4.3.3.2.2 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None; the HVDC PLUS design is less susceptible to damage from seismic shaking due to the simpler, more compact design. |
GEO-4: Liquefaction. The liquefaction impact (Impact GEO-4) described in Section 4.3.3.2.2 of the Draft EIR applies to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
GEO-4: Design Project for Liquefiable Deposits. Mitigation Measure GEO-4 described in Section 4.3.3.2.2 of the Draft EIR shall be applied to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None; the potential for liquefaction to damage converter station facilities under the HVDC PLUS design is reduced due to the smaller, lighter transformers. |
GEO-5: Shrink-Swell/Subsidence. The proposed Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site is potentially underlain with expansive soils, which requires specific attention during grading to avoid future heaving and cracking of overlying materials. The potential for damage due to shrink-swell/subsidence to site facilities is potentially significant. |
GEO-5: Design Project for Shrink-Swell/Subsidence. A program of site-specific exploratory borings and accompanying laboratory testing shall be required to delineate any potentially expansive materials underneath the proposed Project facility sites and to evaluate the potential for site subsidence and identify and implement appropriate design measures (e.g., pile supports or replacement of undesirable materials) in accordance with applicable codes. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-1: Erosion and Contaminated Runoff. The erosion control and runoff impact (Impact WATER-1) described in Section 4.4.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
WATER-1: Erosion Control and Contaminant Source Control. Mitigation Measure WATER-1 described in Section 4.4.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied for the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-2: Surface Water Quality Impacts from HDD. Impact WATER-2 described in Section 4.4.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
WATER-2: Spill Prevention and Control Plan for HDD. Mitigation Measure WATER-2 described in Section 4.4.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied for the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-3: Groundwater Quality Impacts from HDD. HDD could have significant water quality impacts through loss of drilling fluids that would increase suspended material in groundwater. This would be considered a potentially significant impact. |
WATER-3: Use of Pilot Hole and Reaming. HDD shall be performed using a pilot hole plus reaming technique to minimize the potential for impacts to groundwater. To prevent significant water quality impacts, drilling muds shall consist of naturally occurring materials such as water and bentonite clay, plus inert, non-toxic polymers. Both the drilling technique and early detection and response shall be used to minimize release of fluids to the environment. HDD shall start with completion of a small-diameter pilot hole. The pilot hole is gradually enlarged using reaming. This technique acts to prevent sudden loss of large volumes of drilling fluids. Early detection and rapid response shall be implemented to minimize loss of drilling fluids. In the event loss of drilling fluids is detected, natural LCMs such as cotton dust, cottonseed hulls, wood fiber, mica, and cedar fiber shall be added to the drilling fluid. Alternative actions that shall be considered and implemented, as required, include reduction in drilling pressure, thickening of the fluid mixture, and construction of spill control structures, pits, and silt fences onshore, or silt curtains offshore. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-8: Flooding. The northwest corner of the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Converter Station Alternative 1 site (temporary construction access road only) is located within the 100-year flood zone. |
WATER-8: Flood Mitigation. Design the site to adequately minimize risk from 100-year flood. Typical measures that shall be incorporated into the project design include:
|
Less than significant |
None; this potential impact does not apply to the HVDC PLUS converter station site (as it did for the HVDC conventional design site), but it does apply to the temporary construction access road that connects to the Mirant plant access road. |
TRAFFIC-1: Cumulative Traffic Impacts. The Cumulative Traffic Impacts (Impact TRAFFIC-1) on the regional roadway system described in Section 4.10.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
TRAFFIC-1: Coordination to Reduce Cumulative Traffic Impacts. Mitigation Measure TRAFFIC-1 described in Section 4.10.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. No other significant cumulative transportation-related impacts would be expected to occur on local roads. |
Less than significant |
None; the Project's incremental contribution to cumulative traffic impacts would be reduced by an estimated 20-25 % under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller facility, which would require less equipment and material deliveries. |
TRAFFIC-2: Oversized Loads. The Oversized Loads impact (Impact TRAFFIC-2) described in Section 4.10.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies to the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
TRAFFIC-2: Coordination of Oversized Loads. Mitigation Measure TRAFFIC-2 described in Section 4.10.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None; oversized load impacts would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller transformers (60 tons versus 80 tons of oil). |
NOISE-1: Converter Station Operations Sound Levels. Sound levels from the operation of the West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station would range from 55 to 74 dBA Ldn at the property lines, which is below the Pittsburg 75 dBA Ldn requirement. However, the applicant has committed to installing a noise wall around the southern, western, and eastern boundaries of the converter station site. |
NOISE-1: Noise Barrier Installation for Converter Station. An acoustical barrier approximately 10 feet high would be erected around a portion of the converter station. If final design determined that an acoustical barrier were unnecessary, it shall not be required. |
Less than significant |
None; the operational noise level for the HVDC PLUS design at the property boundaries in Pittsburg would be reduced relative to the HVDC Conventional design evaluated in the Draft and Final EIRs. |
PS-1: Construction-related Fire Hazards. The construction-related fire hazards impact (Impact PS-1) discussed in Section 4.12.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
PS-1: Fire Water Service. Mitigation Measure PS-1 discussed in Section 4.12.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be conducted at this site. |
Less than significant |
None |
PS-2: Existing Underground Utilities. The underground utilities impact (Impact PS-2) discussed in Section 4.12.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR applies at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
PS-2: Utility Survey. Mitigation Measure PS-2 described in Section 4.12.3.2.1 of the Draft EIR shall be conducted at this site. |
Less than significant |
None |
PS-3: Operations Fire Hazards. The operations fire hazards impact (Impact PS-3) discussed in Section 4.12.3.2.2 of the Draft EIR applies at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
PS-3: Operations Fire Prevention. Mitigation Measure PS-3 discussed in Section 4.12.3.3.2 of the Draft EIR shall be conducted at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. |
Less than significant |
None |
VIS-1: Converter Station Domination of View. The Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station would be visible from West Tenth Street. Since the architectural design character of the building and the general character of proposed lighting have not been identified in detail, there is the possibility of generating significant visual impacts based upon the potential of the Project to dominate the scene or become obtrusive on views from West Tenth Street. While this impact has been classified as less than significant, without design controls it could still be adverse. This adversity can be lessened through the application of mitigation measures VIS-1a and VIS-1b. |
VIS-1a: Plan Submittal Requirements for Building Materials and Colors. Mitigation Measure VIS-1a described in Section 4.13.3.2 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. Architectural design and site plans, plus a color and material palette, shall be reviewed and approved by the Pittsburg Planning Commission. Final architectural plans and conditions of approval shall be reviewed and signed off by the appropriate planning and building officials prior to operation of the Project. VIS-1b: Plan Submittal Requirements for Landscaping. Mitigation Measure VIS-1b described in Section 4.13.3.2 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. Landscape design plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Pittsburg Planning Commission. Final landscape plans shall be reviewed and signed off by the appropriate planning and engineering officials prior to operation of the Project. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be substantially reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to smaller footprint (3 to 4 acres versus 5 to 6 acres for HVDC Conventional design), shorter buildings (35 feet versus 65 feet), shorter lightning arrestors (65 feet versus 80 feet) and reduced number, and the addition of the 255-foot-wide (potentially landscaped) buffer area north of West Tenth Street. |
VIS-2: Converter Station will Create Substantial Light and Glare. There is potential for the Project to cast more ambient light into the immediate area than the existing conditions. There is also the possibility that the luminaries of some of the lighting fixtures may be seen directly by travelers along the Pittsburg-Antioch Highway which through the abrupt contrast of the fixtures' light with the surrounding general darkness, may create the effect of glare. While this impact has been classified as less than significant, without design controls it may still be adverse. This adversity can be lessened through the application of Mitigation Measure VIS-2. |
VIS-2: Plan Submittal Requirements for Lighting. Mitigation Measure VIS-2 described in Section 4.13.3.2 of the Draft EIR shall be applied at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site. Lighting plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Pittsburg Planning Commission. Final lighting plans shall be reviewed and signed off by the appropriate planning and building officials prior to operation of the Project. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced with the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller footprint and smaller buildings requiring less lighting. |
HAZ-1: Removal of Potentially Hazardous Building Materials Resulting from Demolition. Existing structures on the converter station site contain or potentially contain ACMs and LBP. Improper removal or remediation of these materials could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-1: Complete an ACM Abatement Plan and an LBP Abatement Plan. Phase II ACM and LBP surveys on the converter station site shall be conducted to fill data gaps and to support development of worker safety procedures, in accordance with regulatory requirements to protect construction workers and the public. The ACM and LBP Abatement Plans shall be completed in compliance with applicable regulations based on the historical and newly acquired ACM and LBP data. If ACM and LBP were confirmed to be present in concentrations above regulatory limits, the Project proponent shall use certified asbestos and lead-based paint removal workers, conduct dust monitoring, and dispose of generated wastes offsite. A site Health and Safety Plan shall also be prepared for this work. |
Less than significant |
None |
HAZ-2: Soil Removal. Soils removed during construction of the converter station and cable routes could be contaminated. Improper sampling, handling, analyzing, or characterizing of the soils could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-2: Soil Removal Protocols. Previously uncharacterized soils that are stained or odiferous shall be segregated on plastic, sampled, and characterized for onsite use or offsite disposal. The Soil and Groundwater Management Plans shall detail storage, transportation, and disposal options for soil and groundwater excavated/extracted during the converter station construction. The plans shall also specify dust monitoring needs for soil excavation and management. Previously characterized hazardous soils shall be loaded onto trucks for offsite disposal. Hazardous soil disposal requires that hazardous waste manifests accompany the waste. Hazardous waste transporters shall be required to haul hazardous soils to a hazardous waste landfill that can properly accept them. The personnel handling the hazardous soils are required to have met the OSHA hazardous work operations training requirements. A Health and Safety Plan shall be prepared for this work. Previously characterized non-hazardous soils shall be stockpiled for onsite or offsite reuse or offsite disposal, as needed. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would potentially be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller footprint and subsurface excavation requirements. |
HAZ-3: Construction-phase Hazardous Materials Use. Hazardous materials would be used during construction activities. Misuse, inadequate storage, or improper disposal of these materials could result in a significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-3: Reduction of Hazards During Construction Phase. The hazards presented by the use of hazardous materials during the construction phase are well understood, and the appropriate management controls to mitigate potential impacts shall be implemented. These controls include: 1) developing required management plans; 2) secondary containment; 3) separate storage of incompatible materials; and 4) proper training of personnel. Additionally, construction personnel shall be trained in safety and defensive emergency response procedures. Construction personnel shall also receive hazardous waste-related training that focuses on the recognition of potentially contaminated soil and/or groundwater that may be encountered during subsurface excavations for foundations or pipeline/cable trenches. If such contaminated soil or groundwater is suspected, contingency procedures shall be followed to protect worker safety and public health. All vehicles and construction equipment shall be inspected to ensure that no fluids are leaking (e.g., oil, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, or brake fluid) and that all fuels and fluids are stored in proper, clearly labeled containers. Hazardous materials that must be disposed of will be disposed of as hazardous waste in accordance with the appropriate regulations for storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller facility requiring less hazardous materials (e.g., fuel) to construct. |
HAZ-4: Construction-phase Waste Streams. Improper storage and disposal of solid waste and hazardous construction wastes could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-4: Management of Construction-phase Waste Streams. The onsite management and offsite disposal procedures of solid wastes (including potentially contaminated soil) shall be detailed in a Solid Waste Management Plan for the Project. Waste shall be stockpiled temporarily before disposal offsite. The local fire departments and emergency management teams shall be provided a list of the waste material expected to be generated and stored onsite. Hazardous wastes generated during construction shall be collected in hazardous waste accumulation containers near the point of generation and moved daily to the construction contractor's 90-day hazardous waste storage area at the converter station site. The accumulated waste shall be delivered to an authorized waste management facility. The exact volume of hazardous wastes to be generated at the converter station site cannot be estimated at this time, but the estimated amount of excavated soil that would need to be disposed of offsite is estimated at approximately 15,000 cubic yards for this converter station site. Even if this entire amount of excavated soil would need to be disposed of as hazardous waste, it would not exceed a significant portion of the available hazardous waste landfill capacity in California. The capacity details of various landfills for both non-hazardous and hazardous waste are detailed in Table 4.14-5, above. The capacity and estimates for daily volumes of waste received were verified, as detailed in the personal communications provided in the references for this section. Management of these wastes shall be the responsibility of the construction contractor(s). Typical management practices required for contractor waste include recycling when possible, proper storage of waste and debris, including covering daily to prevent wind dispersion, and weekly pickup of waste with disposal of non-hazardous wastes at local Class III landfills. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller facility, smaller footprint, and reduced excavation requirements. |
HAZ-5: Construction-phase Accidental Spills. An accidental spill or a release of hazardous materials could occur during construction. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-5: Construction-phase Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures. The following shall be implemented both to prevent spills from occurring and to minimize impacts in the event that they do occur:
|
Less than significant |
None; the potential for this impact to occur would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller construction requirements and commensurate reduction in hazardous material usage. |
HAZ-6: Construction-phase Dust and Volatilization of Contaminants. Excavation of contaminated soil and the generation of hazardous waste soils could result in construction dust and volatilization of contaminants that pose environmental and human health risks, particularly to construction workers. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-6: Reduction of Construction Dust and Volatilization of Contaminants. Dust control measures (i.e., keeping the soil wet during excavation) shall be implemented during excavation and construction activities, and dust monitoring shall be performed. Suspected contaminated soil that is stockpiled on the sites shall be covered daily with plastic to prevent volatilization of contaminants and to control dust. Contaminated soil may also be loaded directly onto trucks for transport to an appropriate offsite disposal facility. The loaded soils shall be properly covered and manifested as necessary. Dust monitoring shall be performed during excavation and loading of hazardous soils. The accumulated waste shall then be delivered to an authorized waste management facility. Dust monitoring shall confirm that the dust control measures are effectively protecting site workers and the public. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would potentially be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to reduced earthwork and excavation requirements. |
HAZ-7: Contaminated Groundwater. The converter station site may have contaminated groundwater. This groundwater may be encountered during excavation, construction dewatering, or other subgrade activities. Control or remediation of the site groundwater may be a requirement for redevelopment of the property by the lead regulatory agency for the proposed Project. Failure to properly treat and/or dispose of water collected during dewatering activities or to control the contaminated groundwater flow could result in a potentially significant impact to the site or to downgradient sites and/or water bodies. |
HAZ-7: Contaminated Groundwater Control. If groundwater is encountered during construction at the converter station site, the water shall be collected onsite in a tank or tanks, sampled, and analyzed. Based on the analytical data, the water shall be characterized for disposal by one of the following methods:
If groundwater was encountered at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) Converter Station site and it was found to be contaminated, it is possible that the Regional Water Quality Control Board would require groundwater control as part of the development plan for the Project on the site. Contamination at the Pittsburg West Tenth Street Alternative 1 (E/W) site, if any, would likely be caused by offsite sources which would probably not require onsite remedial action. Potential groundwater-remedial strategies would depend on a number of factors including: site contaminants, evaluation of impacts to human health and the environment, and evaluation of the technical merits of available remedial strategies. Based on these factors the final selection would be negotiated between the RWQCB and TBC. Potential remedial options provided herein are for informational purposes only. Potential groundwater control methodologies include installing a slurry wall around a portion or the entire contaminated site combined with groundwater pump and treatment and discharge of treated groundwater to a storm drain/sewer system under the authority of an NPDES permit. Other alternative technologies include in-situ biological treatment and in-situ oxidation or reduction, depending on the site-specific contaminants and hydrogeological conditions. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would potentially be reduced due to shallower excavation depth requirements associated with the HVDC PLUS design. |
HAZ-8: Operations-phase Hazardous Materials Usage. Hazardous materials shall be used during operations and maintenance activities. Misuse, inadequate storage, or improper disposal of these materials could result in a potentially significant environmental impact. |
HAZ-8: Control of Operations-phase Hazardous Materials. A Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) shall be developed and implemented prior to turnover of site management from the construction contractor to the operating company. All hazardous materials shall be handled and stored in accordance with applicable codes and regulations. Storage quantities of all hazardous materials shall be minimized, and non-hazardous materials shall be substituted for hazardous materials at the converter station to the extent practicable. Small-quantity chemicals used for maintenance tasks shall be kept in appropriate inflammable material or corrosive material storage lockers. Bulk chemicals shall be stored in ASTs, and all other chemicals shall be stored in their original shipping containers. Incompatible materials shall be stored in separate storage containment areas. Chemical storage areas and transfer areas shall be equipped with secondary containment sufficient in size to contain the volume of the largest container or tank, including an allowance for rainwater. Areas susceptible to potential leaks and/or spills shall be paved and bermed or otherwise secondarily contained. Specifically, the transformers and the diesel ASTs would have secondary containment. Periodic inspections shall be conducted to ensure that all containers are secure and properly marked. Piping and tanks will be protected from potential traffic hazards by concrete or other barriers. Hazardous materials will be delivered to the converter station periodically. Transportation of these materials shall comply with all applicable regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the EPA, DTSC, the California Highway Patrol, and the State Fire Marshal. An HMBP shall be prepared prior to delivery of specified hazardous materials to the converter station in conformance with Title 19 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and California Health and Safety Code Section 25504. The HMBP requires facilities to develop the following information:
|
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced due to the smaller facility and reduced maintenance requirements associated with the HVDC PLUS design. |
HAZ-9: Operations-phase Waste Streams. Improper storage and disposal of operational wastes could result in a significant environmental impact. This impact is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-9: Manage Waste Generation, Storage, and Disposal During Operations Phase. Before facility start-up, an application shall be made to DTSC for a hazardous waste generator number. The facility shall not treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in a manner that will cause the facility to be characterized as a treatment, storage and disposal facility (TSDF). A detailed waste management plan shall be prepared prior to start-up to ensure proper storage, labeling, packaging, record keeping, manifesting, minimization, and disposal of all hazardous materials and wastes. The waste management plan will include:
Scrap materials such as paper, packing materials, glass, metal, and plastic shall be segregated and managed for recycling. Non-recyclable inert wastes shall be stored in covered trash bins in accordance with local ordinances and picked up by an authorized local trash hauler on a regular basis for transport and disposal in suitable landfill. Skimmed oil collected from equipment drains and other liquids from equipment shall be transported by an authorized carrier to a certified recycling facility. |
Less than significant |
None; this impact would be reduced due to the smaller facility under the HVDC PLUS design generating less operational waste. |
HAZ-10: Operations-phase Accidental Spills. Non-compliance with regulatory requirements associated with storage, use, and containment of hazardous materials and/or petroleum hydrocarbons could result in accidental spills. The impact from accidental spills of these materials is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-10: Operations-phase Spill Prevention, Controls, and Countermeasures. The following shall be implemented during operations:
|
Less than significant |
None; the potential for this impact to occur would be reduced due to elimination of the need for an emergency generator and its associated diesel fuel under the HVDC PLUS design versus the HVDC Conventional design. |
HAZ-11: Operations-phase Fire and Explosion Risk. Non-compliance with regulatory requirements associated with storage, use, and containment of flammable materials could result in a fire or explosion. If the onsite fire protection equipment could not address the fire, outside agencies would need to be called. This impact is considered potentially significant. The impact of a fire or explosion is considered potentially significant. |
HAZ-11: Reduction of Fire and Explosion Risk and Emergency Support During Operations Phase. The flashpoints of transformer oil and diesel fuel are 295°F and 100°F, respectively, and the auto ignition points are 484°F and 494°F, respectively (Sax, 1992; MSDS for transformer oil; MSDS for diesel fuel). The National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) assigns lubricating oils a fire hazard rating of 1, meaning that the materials "must be preheated before ignition can occur. Materials of these types require considerable preheating, under all ambient temperature conditions, before ignition and combustion can occur" (Siemens, 2006). The converter station shall have onsite fire protection systems (including emergency backup systems). During the detailed design phase of the proposed Project, potential fire protection designs and systems shall be reviewed with local agencies to finalize design details. In general, the fire protection system shall consist of automatic detection and firefighting equipment. The fire detection control panel shall be located in the control room and shall be connected to the control and protection system for remote annunciation. The fire alarm shall be initiated automatically by smoke, heat, or flame detectors; or manually by push-button. A combination of detectors shall be used, including infrared and ultraviolet detectors, ionization and optical smoke detectors, and rate-of-rise temperature-sensitive detectors, depending on the equipment and/or space being monitored. Audible alarms and flashing lights shall be activated in the event of a fire. The equipment or area where the alarm is triggered shall be indicated on the control panel. The firefighting equipment would initiate automatically, using water sprays and curtains or an appropriate gas-extinguishing agent. Fire detection and automatic firefighting equipment shall be connected to a power supply within the fire-detection control panel, which will be connected to the mains via a power supply/battery charger unit with an internal 24-volt battery. A pump house shall be included within the facility with 2 diesel fire-water pumps, each 225 kW. |
Less than significant |
None; this potential impact would be reduced under the HVDC PLUS design due to the smaller transformer oil requirements and the elimination of the emergency generator/diesel fuel storage. |
HAZ-12: Impacts from Seismic Activity. Failure to abide by the building code for Seismic Zone 4 could lead to damage to the facilities and resulting spills of hazardous materials. This impact could be potentially significant. |
HAZ-12: Manage Seismic Activity. To minimize seismic damage to the facilities with resulting hazardous materials spills, the designers and construction contractor shall follow the 2001 California Building Code for Seismic Zone 4. This action would reduce Impact HAZ-12 to a less-than-significant level. |
Less than significant |
None; the HVDC PLUS technology with its smaller, less complex design is considered to be less susceptible to damage from a seismic event/ strong ground shaking. |
Potentially Significant Impact |
Mitigation Measure(s) |
Resulting Level of Significance |
Change in Impact Finding and/or Mitigation Measures for HVDC PLUS (Addendum) Versus HVDC Conventional (Final EIR)3 |
Offshore Cable Route |
|||
AIR-3: Marine Construction – Criteria Pollutants. Based on Project marine emissions rates in comparison to background levels, the air quality impacts of criteria pollutant emissions of the marine construction phase are considered to be potentially significant. Based on Project marine emissions rates in comparison to background levels, the air quality impacts of criteria pollutant emissions of the marine construction phase are considered to be potentially significant. |
AIR-3: Marine Vessel Emission Controls. The following shall be implemented to control emissions from vessels owned by Prysmian:
|
Less than significant |
None |
AIR-4: Marine Construction – Toxic Air Contaminants. Although there are no established impact significance criteria set forth by BAAQMD, the diesel PM emissions from marine construction may be potentially significant. |
AIR-4: Implement Mitigation AIR-3. Implement Mitigation Measure AIR-3. |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-5: Water Quality Impacts from Cable Laying Operation. Nearshore and offshore sediment in the Potrero area is contaminated with elevated levels of PAHs. Disturbance of these sediments could result in substantial water quality impacts. This would be considered a potentially significant impact. |
WATER-5:
Avoidance of Sediment Contamination. To avoid potential known nearshore and offshore
sediment contamination, |
Less than significant |
None |
WATER-7: Water Quality Impacts from Vessel Fuel Spills. Water quality degradation from vessel fuel spills would likely not be significant in light of its low probability and the past record. However, a potentially significant spill could still occur. This event would constitute a potentially significant impact. |
WATER-7: Vessel Fuel Spill Response Plan. All vessel operators associated with the proposed Project shall update their contingency plans and continue to use emergency response services for pollution incidents. Review of updates and modifications to plans shall be done under the USCG's regular oversight of oil spill contingency plans. The work of updating and expanding the spill response plans shall be based on NOAA's Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI), which involves the systematic compilation in a standardized format of information related to coastal shoreline sensitivity, biological resources, and human uses. |
Less than significant |
None |
CUL-3: Offshore Cable Route Archaeological Resources. Submerged and buried archaeological resources have been identified along the offshore DC cable route. Disturbance of these historical resources is considered a potentially significant impact. |
CUL-3a: Archaeological Resources Geophysical Survey. A geophysical remote-sensing survey shall be conducted along the offshore cable route to detect any potential submerged or sub-bottom archaeological resources. Depending on the geographic or bathymetric setting, an appropriate remote-sensing field survey could include deployment of a side scan sonar, sub-bottom profiler, and magnetometer to help detect these resources. The results of the geophysical survey will be reviewed by a qualified marine archaeologist and a report documenting these efforts and interpreting the results shall be produced. CUL-3b: Archaeological Resources Avoidance. Potential submerged and/or buried archaeological resources detected through the geophysical survey shall be avoided unless they can satisfactorily be determined to not represent archaeological resources (e.g., modern debris, existing infrastructure) as documented in the technical report. CUL-3c: Archaeological Resources Supplemental Underwater Investigation. If it is infeasible to avoid potential submerged and/or buried archaeological resources, follow-up diver survey or Remote Operated Vehicle investigations might be required to positively identify the targets. If targets are determined to be archaeological resources, they should be evaluated against the NRHP/CRHR significance criteria. If the resources are not eligible for the NRHP/CRHR, then no further consideration of these resources is required. If the resources are eligible for the NRHP/CRHR, Data Recovery (Mitigation Measure CUL-1b) may be required. |
Less than significant |
None |
LU-4: Increased Vessel Traffic. Project construction activities would temporarily increase vessel traffic in the Bay. Recreational users of the Bay could experience a temporary increased risk from additional vessel traffic. This impact is considered to be potentially significant. |
LU-4a: Vessel Crew Procedures. Marine crews shall watch for navigational hazards (i.e., during periods of high use by recreational boaters including windsurfers within the vicinity of selected terminal locations; during periods of high recreational use, such as weekends or race events; or when weather hazards exist) to reduce the risk of incidents involving construction vessels and recreational users in the Bay. LU-4b: Coast Guard Coordination. Construction crew management shall coordinate construction activities with the USCG Safety Branch to ensure that no marine recreational events conflicts arise. The Project coordinator would include information to the USCG which would issue a Local Notice to Mariners. In addition, each affected harbor district will be made aware of the timing of water-based Project activities such as the cable laying operations. Applicable navigation rules will be enforced including the Cable Act of 1992 (47 CFR §76) which states that other vessels must maintain a 1.15 mile (1-nm) separation from a vessel laying or repairing an undersea cable. |
Less than significant |
None |
LU-5: Potential Conflict with Local Plans and Policies. Cable installation is not expected to conflict with local jurisdictions plans or policies. Based on available feedback, no apparent conflict in land use plans or policies would occur with installation of the submarine cable. However, Contra Costa County has indicated that their agency would incur some level of responsibility and could require relocation of utilities where necessary. In addition, the City of Martinez requires a Conditional Use Permit for installation of the offshore cable. Not obtaining appropriate planning permits or coordinating with local agencies would be considered a potentially significant impact. |
LU-5: Local Plans and Policies Coordination. The Project proponent shall coordinate with the City of Martinez and Contra Costa County to provide adequate notification and gain the appropriate permits and authorization required for installation of the submarine cable. |
Less than significant |
None |
MTRANS-1: Vessel Navigation Hazards. For the duration of construction, the vessels engaged in cable laying would present a potential hazard to navigation on the Bay. The cable-laying vessels themselves would be "restricted in their ability to maneuver." This means that the nature of the vessels themselves or of their operations limits their ability to take actions to avoid collisions that would be expected of otherwise fully maneuverable vessels. Vessels are by definition restricted in their ability to maneuver when engaged in lying, servicing, or picking up a navigational mark, submarine cable, or pipeline. Statutory navigation rules define the responsibilities of vessels restricted in their ability to maneuver, and of other vessels operating in their vicinity, all aimed at preventing collisions or other incidents. Non-compliance with these rules would be considered to result in a potentially significant impact. |
MTRANS-1a: Project Registration, Information and Pilotage. Large construction vessels like the C/S Giulio Verne and any support vessels shall be required to notify the VTS at the beginning and end of each transit, and would be monitored continuously. The USCG would also notify operators of vessels in the area of the construction activities via Notices to Mariners. To ensure safe entrance into the Bay, all ships operating under foreign registry, like the Giulio Verne, are required to have a San Francisco Bar Pilot navigate the ship into the Bay. MTRANS-1b: Compliance with Navigation Rules. The vessels involved in cable laying shall be required to identify themselves and operate in accordance with the COLREGS. The applicable navigation rules for San Francisco Bay shall regulate the cable laying operations and are designed to prevent collisions. Within the Bay, the operators of all vessels engaged in the Project shall have the legal responsibility to preclude hazardous situations, according to the applicable navigation rules MTRANS-1c: Precautionary Area. A safety precautionary area shall be established around the construction vessels, and will be identified via the USCG Notice to Mariners to make vessels operating in the area aware of Project activities. All cable-laying vessels shall also operate in accordance with the applicable navigation rules including the Cable Act of 1992. MTRANS-1d: Publication of Cable Location. The planned location of the cable has been reviewed with the US Army Corps of Engineers, at local bottom depths as indicated by soundings on current navigation charts. The project proponent/construction contractor shall document the specific as-built location of the submarine cable for its entire length and shall provide GPS coordinates for critical waypoints of the cable alignment as required by the USACE and NOAA for inclusion on San Francisco Bay navigational charts and in the applicable volume(s) of the U.S. Coast Pilot. All cable-laying vessels shall also operate in accordance with the applicable navigation rules including the Cable Act of 1992. |
Less than significant |
None |
| Return to the Table of Contents. | On to the next section. |