| SECTION 4.0 | ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION |
| PROPOSED PROJECT |
This section assesses the potential impacts of the proposed Project on the operation of commercial marine transportation, including commercial fishing vessels, on San Francisco Bay. Accordingly, this section focuses on commercial marine transportation, including the proposed use of vessels to install the cable in the Bay between San Francisco and Pittsburg, and does not address proposed onshore facilities. Specifically, this section deals with the navigational setting, movements of commercial marine vessels, and commercial fishing (Figure 4.9-1) (including commercial recreational fishing) within San Francisco Bay, and the potential navigational hazards related to the proposed Project. This section includes discussions about commercial vessel types and their activity in the Project area, as well as the hazards posed by the weather, current, and submarine structures.
Impacts of the Project on the fisheries natural resource are considered in Section 4.6, Marine Biological Resources, non-commercial recreational fishing is discussed in Section 4.8, Land Use and Recreation, and surface transportation is discussed in Section 4.10, Traffic and Transportation.
4.9.1 Environmental Setting
Currents above 2 knots are considered strong and potentially hazardous to vessels if proper corrections and allowances are not made, particularly during the slow-speed maneuvering required within most of the Bay. The greatest currents occur at the Golden Gate, with the average maximum flood being 3.3 knots and the maximum ebb being 4.5 knots. There are also strong tidal currents all along San Francisco's waterfront from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Bay Bridge, and around Treasure Island on the east and west sides. Even as far south as Hunters Point, there are currents up to 2.2 knots. These currents, combined with the strong winds, make maneuvering large vessels at slow speed hazardous without tugboat assistance. Currents are similarly strong in the Carquinez Strait, with ebbs of as much as 3.6 knots.
The volume of vessel traffic in the Project area was estimated on the basis of USGS records of 2004 vessel movements in San Francisco Bay. These records, obtained from Coast Guard Vessel Traffic Service San Francisco Bay, were sorted by type of vessel (ocean-going commercial, intra-bay commercial, and ferries). To capture seasonality, a representative month for each of the four seasons was chosen for an in-depth study (January, April, July, October). The average number of vessel movements per hour of the day and per day of the week was counted for each season. It was also determined which areas of the Bay these vessels traveled through. For this the Bay was divided into three sections.
These sections are shown graphically on Figure 4.9-2.
4.9.1.2.3 Ferries. Commuter ferries constitute the largest class of commercial vessel traffic in San Francisco Bay. During the peak hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. (Figure 4.9-9) there can be as many as 20 ferry movements in the course of one hour. Monday through Friday there are approximately 250 ferry movements per day, and slightly fewer on Saturday and Sunday (Figure 4.9-10). There are fewer transits during winter than any other season. The majority of current commuter ferry operations serve San Francisco via the ferry terminal at the foot of Market Street. Some commuter services also operate from piers 39 and 41, the locations of popular tour operations. The services originating at Larkspur, Alameda/Oakland, Vallejo, and Tiburon and connecting to San Francisco are the most traveled. The San Francisco waterfront is the most congested area because the major routes converge at the San Francisco Ferry Building. Figure 4.9-11 shows the relative volumes of ferry traffic in the different sections of the Bay. Ferries are not required to stay on a designated route and are typically very maneuverable, operating at speeds of up to 33 knots.
Year |
December Platoon |
Even Platoon |
Odd Platoon |
2004/2005 |
20 |
40 |
34 |
2003/2004 |
44 |
48 |
49 |
2002/2003 |
32 |
71 |
74 |
1 Source: Azat, 2005.
Pacific herring typically spawn in the inter-tidal or shallow sub-tidal areas; in San Francisco Bay the herring spawn in near-shore areas. Spawning is known to occur between Redwood City and the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge on the western side of the Bay and on the eastern side from the Berkeley Flats to Bay Farm Island (see Figure 4.9-1). The fishing fleet follows the spawning activities, so the location of vessels engaged in fishing changes continuously. In the middle of a large spawning event nearly all the boats in a seasonal platoon may crowd the spawning area, the vessels and nets effectively closing that area to any other traffic.
The season for harvesting herring eggs from kelp is from December 1 to March 31. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) issues permits for operators in this fishery to place rafts of lines in likely spawning locations, from which giant kelp plants are suspended. After the spawning herring have deposited their eggs on the suspended kelp, the eggs are harvested from the plants, packaged, and transported to market. This fishing activity occurs principally in the near-shore areas of the Bay identified as herring spawning grounds. Rafts and fixed lines used in the herring egg fishery are regulated by the CDFG, and are subject to all the regulations of vessel navigation on San Francisco Bay (Azat, 2005).
Key fishing areas within the Bay are shown on Figure 4.9-1. These areas include the South Bay, northwestern San Pablo Bay, the Carquinez Strait, and salt ponds in the South Bay. Fishing also occurs in waters less than 20 feet deep in the channels of the Bay's shallow reaches.
Over the last 10 years, the number of vessels harvesting shrimp has remained steady at about 14. In 1999, eight trawlers harvested shrimp in north San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, Petaluma Creek, and the Carquinez Strait. Fishing occurs year round but landings usually peak from June through November. Monthly variations in landings may have as much to do with changes in salinity in the water, as with fluctuations in demand for bait shrimp by sport anglers (CDFG, 2001).
Other applicable federal navigation rules would be enforced including the Cable Act of 1992 (47 CFR Part 76), which states that other vessels must maintain a 1.15‑mile (1‑nm) separation from a vessel laying or repairing an undersea cable. Statutory navigation rules define the responsibilities of vessels restricted in their ability to maneuver, such as cable-laying vessels, and of other vessels operating in their vicinity, all aimed at preventing collisions or other incidents.
The following paragraphs describe RNAs that correspond to the proposed cable route.
San Francisco Bay RNA. The San Francisco Bay RNA extends from the precautionary zone east of the Golden Gate Bridge to Alcatraz Island. Because of the large number of vessels entering and departing San Francisco Bay, traffic lanes were established under the Golden Gate Bridge and in the Central Bay to separate opposing traffic and reduce vessel congestion. The lanes are located where voluntary traffic lanes previously existed. Use of these lanes and adherence to the indicated direction of travel is required by the USCG for large vessels, and recommended for all other vessels.
Because vessels converge and cross in such a manner that one-way traffic flow patterns are not possible, two precautionary areas were established in this RNA. The Golden Gate Precautionary Area encompasses the waters around the Golden Gate Bridge between the Golden Gate and the Central Traffic Lanes. The Central Bay Precautionary Area encompasses the large portion of the Central Bay and part of the South Bay.
North Ship Channel RNA and San Pablo Strait Channel RNA. The North Ship Channel and San Pablo Strait Channel RNAs consist of the existing charted channels and delineate the only areas where the depths of water are sufficient to allow the safe transit of large vessels. The strong tidal currents in these channels severely restrict the ability of large vessels to safely maneuver to avoid smaller vessels.
Pinole Shoal Channel RNA. The Pinole Shoal Channel RNA is a constricted waterway that extends from approximately Light 7 to Light 13 of the Pinole Shoal Channel. Its use is restricted to vessels with a draft greater than 20 feet, or towboats with tows drawing more than 20 feet.
Benicia-Martinez Railroad Bridge RNA. The Benicia-Martinez Railroad Bridge RNA is a small, circular area 200 yards in radius, centered on the middle of the channel under the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge between Benicia and Martinez (shown on Figure 4.9-12). The limited horizontal clearance results in a greater chance of vessel collisions with the bridge, especially when visibility is poor. Large vessels are precluded from transiting this RNA when visibility is less than 1,000 yards.
4.9.2.1.3 Vessel Traffic Service in San Francisco Bay. In accordance with the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. § 1221 et seq.), the USCG operates a Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) for San Francisco Bay. Located on Yerba Buena Island, VTS San Francisco Bay controls marine traffic throughout the Bay Area. The VTS is a mandatory system that applies to all vessels of 40 meters or more in length, all vessels certified to carry 50 or more passengers, and all commercial vessels 8 meters or more in length engaged in towing another vessel. Although some small and private vessels are not required to coordinate their movements by contacting the VTS, the USCG monitors all commercial, military, government, and private marine traffic within San Francisco Bay and local coastal waters.
The VTS may issue directions to enhance navigation and vessel safety and protect the marine environment. During conditions of vessel traffic congestion, restricted visibility, adverse weather, or other dangerous conditions, the VTS may manage vessel traffic by specifying times of entry, movement, or departure to, from, or within the VTS area. The San Francisco VTS area "begins" at the outer limit of the Offshore Sector, a 38.7-nautical-mile radius around Mt. Tamalpais. To the north and east, it extends to the entrance to the Petaluma River, into the Napa River as far as the Mare Island Causeway Bridge, and upriver to Sacramento and Stockton.
Construction operations on the scale of the proposed Project are required to contact VTS daily so that construction activities are included in navigational advisories. VTS may also choose to include construction activities in a Local Notice to Mariners. The data used for the vessel traffic study mentioned earlier in this section was provided by the VTS.
4.9.2.1.4 Local Notice to Mariners. Each USCG district is responsible for developing and issuing Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs). LNMs are developed from information received from USCG field units, the general public, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Merchant Fleet, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), and other sources, concerning the establishment of, changes to, and deficiencies in aids to navigation and any other information pertaining to the safety of the waterways within each USCG district. This information includes reports of channel conditions, obstructions, hazards to navigation, dangers, anchorages, restricted areas, regattas, information on bridges such as proposed construction or modification, the establishment or removal of drill rigs and vessels, and similar items.
4.9.2.1.5 Other Federal Agencies. Other federal agencies with authority to regulate development and ensure protection of aquatic and marine resources include the EPA and USFWS.
4.9.2.2 State
4.9.2.2.2 State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The SWRCB has authority to regulate development and ensure protection of aquatic resources.
4.9.2.3 Local
4.9.2.3.1 Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region. In 1990, the California legislature enacted the Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act (OSPRA) (California Government Code Chapter 7.4). OSPRA created Harbor Safety committees for the major harbors of California to prepare Harbor Safety Plans, encompassing all vessel traffic, for the safe navigation and operation of tankers, barges, and other vessels within each harbor. OSPRA also mandates that each Harbor Safety committee annually review its previously adopted Harbor Safety Plan and recommendations and submit the annual review to the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Administrator for comment. The most recent available San Francisco Bay Region Harbor Safety Plan is for 2001.
4.9.2.3.2 Bar Pilots. At all times and in all weather pilots are stationed on pilot boats at the San Francisco sea buoy, approximately 12 miles west of the Golden Gate. These pilots navigate the sand bar just west of the Golden Gate, and help navigate the waters, hazards, and currents in the San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, and Suisun Bay . San Francisco Bar Pilots provide these services for vessel movements to and from all terminals in the Bay and tributaries to the Bay, including the Carquinez Strait.
4.9.2.3.3 Commercial Fishing. The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) develops and implements plans for the conservation and development of San Francisco Bay waters and regulates shoreline development, including commercial fishing facilities. The California State Lands Commission (SLC) manages and protects important natural resources and uses on public lands, including tidelands. Commercial and recreational fishing, kelp harvesting, and aquaculture are all considered important uses by the SLC. Permits are issued for development on tidelands, and mitigation is often required to help protect natural resources and access to those resources. Fisheries, aquaculture, and kelp harvesting are overseen by several state and federal agencies, including the CDFG, federal Secretary of Commerce, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council, and NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).
4.9.2.3.4 Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The RWQCB has authority to regulate development and ensure protection of aquatic resources.
4.9.3 Environmental Impacts
This impact discussion evaluates the proposed Project's potential impacts to vessel traffic, including commercial maritime and commercial fishing operations. The proposed onshore converter station sites, laydown areas, and access roads would not involve interaction with vessel traffic, and thus, are not relevant to this analysis. Any materials delivered to the Port of Oakland for proposed onshore converter station construction would be a part of normal shipping traffic and would not be significant. For this assessment of impacts on vessel traffic, the proposed submarine cable is the focus, primarily during the construction phase, since routine cable operations are not expected to require any marine activity that could affect marine vessel traffic.
4.9.3.2 Construction-related Impacts
The effects of submarine cable installation on vessel traffic are assessed considering various types and numbers of commercial and passenger vessels that would be anticipated to operate in the Bay during cable laying activities.
4.9.3.2.1 Commercial Vessel Traffic. The proposed Project has been designed to minimize interruption of known vessel traffic, and to address potential safety risks to construction crews and other water users. This is principally a function of the cable's location relative to vessel traffic routes, although in some locations geography requires cable and cable-laying operations within navigational channels. The physical presence of vessels and equipment on the Bay would be primarily limited to the 4- to 5-month-long cable installation phase, which would progress 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. During the construction phase, the vessels engaged in and supporting the cable installation would operate in a limited area of the Bay, and would not remain in one location for an extended period. Exposure to vessel traffic would therefore be minimal. The cable-laying ship (C/S Giulio Verne) and barge and support or supply vessels would have limited interaction with other vessels in the vicinity.
The Project would be required to comply with applicable navigational codes and standards, and would be continuously monitored as a local navigational hazard. Vessel operations in the study area are governed and overseen by the USCG, via continuous monitoring, the provision of information to local marine operators, and the established rules of safe and prudent vessel operations. The entire cable-laying operation would be monitored throughout by USCG VTS San Francisco Bay. The USCG's Notice to Mariners continuously advises vessel operators of potential navigational hazards, such as cable-laying operations. The vessels involved in cable laying would be required to identify themselves and operate in accordance with the 72 COLREGS.
Impact MTRANS-1: Vessel Navigation Hazards. For the duration of construction, the vessels engaged in cable laying would present a potential hazard to navigation on the Bay. The cable-laying vessels themselves would be "restricted in their ability to maneuver." This means that the nature of the vessels themselves or of their operations limits their ability to take actions to avoid collisions that would be expected of otherwise fully maneuverable vessels. Vessels are by definition restricted in their ability to maneuver when engaged in laying, servicing, or picking up a navigational mark, submarine cable, or pipeline. Statutory navigation rules define the responsibilities of vessels restricted in their ability to maneuver, and of other vessels operating in their vicinity, all aimed at preventing collisions or other incidents. Non-compliance with these rules would be considered to result in a potentially significant impact.
Mitigation Measure MTRANS-1a: Project Registration, Information and Pilotage. Large construction vessels like the C/S Giulio Verne and any support vessels shall be required to notify the VTS at the beginning and end of each transit, and would be monitored continuously. The USCG would also notify operators of vessels in the area of the construction activities via Notices to Mariners. To ensure safe entrance into the Bay, all ships operating under foreign registry, like the Giulio Verne, are required to have a San Francisco Bar Pilot navigate the ship into the Bay.
Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during submarine cable installation activities
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Mitigation MTRANS-1b: Compliance with Navigation Rules. The vessels involved in cable laying shall be required to identify themselves and operate in accordance with the COLREGS. The applicable navigation rules for San Francisco Bay shall regulate the cable laying operations and are designed to prevent collisions. Within the Bay, the operators of all vessels engaged in the Project shall have the legal responsibility to preclude hazardous situations, according to the applicable navigation rules.Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during submarine cable installation activities
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Mitigation Measure MTRANS-1c: Precautionary Area. A safety precautionary area shall be established around the construction vessels, and will be identified via the USCG Notice to Mariners to make vessels operating in the area aware of Project activities. All cable-laying vessels shall also operate in accordance with the applicable navigation rules including the Cable Act of 1992.
Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during submarine cable installation activities
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Resulting Level of Significance. Mitigation Measures MTRANS-1a, 1b, and 1c would reduce Impact MTRANS-1 to a less-than-significant level.
4.9.3.2.2 Commercial Fishing Operations. Commercial fishing vessels share their use of San Francisco Bay with other maritime uses, including construction and dredging similar to the construction activities of the proposed Project. The cable-laying operation and its attendant vessel traffic would not be an unusual presence, and would be transitory and temporary in nature. For the majority of its length, the proposed cable route does not traverse marine habitat used for commercial fishing of Pacific herring and Bay shrimp. However, in their migrations, pelagic Pacific herring may traverse the proposed route of the cable and the location of the cable-laying vessels. Commercial fishing vessels following these fish would be required under statutory navigation rules to change course to avoid cable-laying operations.
Impact MTRANS-2: Interference with Commercial Fishing Operations. The cable-laying operation could cross the paths of Pacific herring commercially taken in San Francisco Bay. Commercial fishing vessels following these fish could potentially be required to change course by cable-laying operations. This impact is considered potentially significant.
Mitigation Measure MTRANS-2a: Commercial Fishing Avoidance. As practical, cable-laying operations shall be conducted outside the herring fishing season, which occurs annually from December to March. If this is not practical, the cable-laying operations shall be coordinated with USCG and Vessel Traffic Management to minimize potential conflicts.
Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during submarine cable installation activities; Prysmian report any potential conflicts to USCG and Vessel Traffic Management
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Mitigation Measure MTRANS-2b: Project Information. The USCG should notify operators of all vessels in the area, including commercial fishermen, of Project construction activities via Notices to Mariners.Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)/USCG
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during submarine cable installation activities
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Resulting Level of Significance. Mitigation Measure MTRANS-2a and 2b would reduce Impact MTRANS-2 to a less-than-significant level.
4.9.3.2.3 Commercial Sport Fishing Operations. While the majority of their sport fishing takes place outside the Golden Gate, commercial sport fishing vessels may operate on the Bay during the construction phase of the Project. The cable-laying operation would cross the migratory paths of sport fishing species (e.g., salmon, striped bass, and steelhead) followed by commercial recreational fishing vessels. During their migration seasons, these species may traverse the proposed route of the cable and the location of the cable-laying vessels. Commercial sport fishing vessels following these fish would be required under statutory navigation rules to change course to avoid cable-laying operations.
Impact MTRANS-3: Interference with Commercial Sport Fishing Operations. The cable-laying operation would cross the migratory paths of sport fishing species taken by commercial sport fishermen in San Francisco Bay. Commercial sport fishing vessels following these fish could be required to change course to avoid cable-laying operations. This impact is considered potentially significant.
Mitigation Measure MTRANS-3a: Commercial Sport Fishing Avoidance. As practical, cable-laying operations shall be conducted outside the primary seasons of commercial sport fishing on San Francisco Bay. If this is not practical, the cable-laying operations shall be coordinated with USCG and Vessel Traffic Management to minimize potential conflicts.
Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during submarine cable installation activities; Prysmian report any potential conflicts to USCG and Vessel Traffic Management
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Mitigation Measure MTRANS-3b: Project Information. The USCG should notify operators of all vessels in the area, including commercial sport fishermen, of the construction activities via Notices to Mariners.
Implementation Responsibility: Project proponent/construction contractor (Prysmian)
Requirements and Timing: Coordinate construction activities prior to and during sub marine cable installation activities
Monitoring Requirements: City of Pittsburg to monitor and ensure compliance
Resulting Level of Significance. Mitigation Measure MTRANS-3a and 3b would reduce Impact MTRANS-3 to a less-than-significant level.
4.9.3.3 Operations-related Impacts
During operations the cable would typically be buried in 3 to 6 feet of sediment below the Bay floor. In locations where the geophysical makeup of the Bay floor makes burial impossible, the cable would be protected by concrete mattresses or similar protective materials. The entire cable length would be heavily insulated, which would help protect it from damage by anchors. Vessel traffic would pass over the top of the cable corridor uninterrupted and unaffected. The cable would be identified on navigational maps to ensure that vessels using the area are aware of its location, which could help prevent a vessel from inadvertently dropping a large anchor on the cable. Normal operation of the cable would not add to vessel traffic, cause hazards to existing traffic, or substantially change the marine transportation environment.
The physical presence of Project-related vessels and equipment on the Bay would be limited to the 4- to 5-month-long submarine cable installation phase. The only operational case in which potential impacts to vessel traffic would arise would be the unlikely event of a cable break or malfunction, requiring diving or cable repair operations. The impacts and mitigations in this case would be similar to those presented for the construction phase in Section 4.9.3.2, but would only occur over an estimated 10-day to 2-week timeframe while repairs were being made.
The cable route has been designed to avoid designated anchorage areas. However, in an emergency situation, if a large commercial vessel loses power, it may drop anchor to avoid grounding or collision with fixed objects or other vessels. Therefore, there is a remote possibility that a large ship could be forced to drop anchor in a non-designated anchorage area for emergency or precautionary reasons. If such a vessel dropped anchor directly on top of the cable, the cable could be damaged. The condition of the cable would be monitored offsite by computer. In the event of substantial damage or a break in the cable, power transmission would be shut down immediately and the cable would be repaired as described in Section A.5.2.2.
Azat, Sara. 2005. California Department of Fish and Game Herring Biologist. Personal communication with Joe Quartini, URS Corporation. October 27, 2005.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2001. California's Living Marine Resources: A Status Report.
2005. California Commercial Landings For 2004.
SLC (California State Lands Commission). 2005. Shore Terminals, LLC, Marine Oil Terminals Lease Renewal Environmental Impact Report.
| Return to the Table of Contents. | On to the next section. |